The Sagan: A high-end Belgian loafer from Allan Baudoin
I recently became involved with - and more importantly, started using - the best Belgian-style loafers I have ever worn.
They are made by Allan Baudoin, a French bespoke shoemaker who now lives in England and has a workshop in east London. The Sagans - as they are called - are the first thing to come out of his new ready-to-wear brand, Baudoin & Lange.
A Belgian loafer is a fantastically useful shoe. Part way between a slipper and formal loafer, it is smart around the house and casual in the office.
Although it has little internal structure and only a light leather sole, you can still happily wear a Belgian loafer outside - down to the cafe or out to a local dinner.
I wouldn’t commute in them every day, but I do wear them frequently in warmer weather with formal clothing (see Pitti post here) and they are great to keep in the office, given I cycle in most days.
The Sagans are distinct from other Belgian loafers in several ways.
Most importantly, they are made of suede lambskin, rather than the calfskin normally used in Belgians and other dress shoes. Lambskin is most commonly used in gloves and leather jackets, and is softer than calf.
You feel that softness immediately because the Sagans are unlined. Again, most loafers (though certainly not all) are lined with another layer of leather, which gives them greater structure but reduces the softness.
Lambskin isn’t usually used in loafers because it is often poor quality and is too delicate for more structured shoes. Fortunately, Allan has been able to source small runs of very high-quality lambskin from a tannery in Cyprus.
The second thing that sets the Sagans apart is their quality of make. Allan’s background is as a bottier and although these are nothing like bespoke shoes, they carry across some of this attitude to quality manufacture.
For example, the leather binding that runs around the top of the shoe is finished by tucking underneath itself, leaving a neat line of leather around the outside. (Indicated above.) All Belgians and most dress loafers just cut the leather at this point, leaving a raw edge.
The sock is also French calf leather - softer and more breathable - and the insoles are hand-cut leather, rather than composite cardboard. That insole has a cushioned insert which makes them very comfortable: an actual insole lasted with the upper, rather than just padded socks.
High-end dress shoes have many of these details, but Belgians tend not to, and any shoes rarely do at this price point (£245). The shoes are also hand-lasted, which is useful with the lambskin to help control the tension around the shoe in such a soft leather.
On that point, one thing that I found striking about the Sagans is their ability to adapt to lots of different foot widths.
Although they are built on a relatively slim, elegant last, the softness of the lambskin and the fact they are unlined means they can stretch to particularly wide feet, and remain perfectly comfortable.
My feet are a little narrow - usually E, sometimes D - but they fit me very well, and I’ve seen them fit people with much wider fittings too. In a casual shoe like this, which is rarely going to come in several widths, this is an important factor.
I’ve been wearing my Sagans for several weeks now, and they were particularly useful in the couple of hot weeks we had in May. They're designed largely for internal use, but can be worn outside (with care).
I used to wear Rubinacci Belgians - those are the ones shown in Florence last summer. But when I pick them up now they feel so poorly made by comparison.
The Sagans are photographed here with green linen trousers from Paul Stuart, a cream cotton sweater from Anderson & Sheppard, and shirt from Luca Avitabile. (The A&S sweater has the same nice, slim fit as the Shetlands and is decent value at £195.)
The Sagans have been available for a while to Allan’s bespoke clients, but are being relaunched at the moment - with several improvements like the cushioned insole, thin toe puff and heel counter, and a nice three-nail design in the heel which has become Baudoin & Lange's trade mark.
On the site at the moment there is purely a form to register interest. The full information and sales will be ready in a couple of weeks.
www.baudoinandlange.com @baudoinandlange
Photos: Jamie Ferguson @jkf_man
Hi Simon,
Good stuff! I am normally a 6.5F with EG – basically requiring the heel grip of a 6.5 but the toe room of a 7. Based on your experience with these loafers should I stick with 6.5 or size up to 7? Cheers
I’d contact Allan directly to get advice on sizing. He has the broadest experience of different feet and sizes
Hi Simon,
Where did the sweater in your photo come from ?
Regards
Paul
Have another read….
Nice one. Which color is it of the pair in the pictures?
Good question. I am wearing the dark brown, and pointing at a separate pair, in oak brown
I find the similarity to slippers rather off-putting and it makes me wonder what I would actually wear these shoes for? Round the house? Well, maybe, but then why not just keep slippers on in the first place? Casual wear? Possibly, but then why spend £245 on a pair of shoes which will leave most people thinking that you ran out of the house without getting dressed properly this morning?
I can see why you’d think that Matt, but I’ve found them extremely useful. Around the house they are much nicer and more elegant than a slipper (as well as better made). Around the office they also work well for me – potentially as an alternative to a dress shoe on a warmer day or when I need one). They are also great for travel – to wear for the hours between arriving at an airport and getting in a cab at the other end.
People also unfortunately use far worse shoes for this same purpose, like driving shoes. Which are in no way designed to be used outside and as a result deteriorate quickly.
They seem to me actually a great shoe for holidays, light for luggage and a smart evening shoe to compliment the daytime/ poolside sandal or driving loafer. They would also put you a few style notches above the Birkenstock wearer at the table opposite.
Simon,
I’m going to show my ignorance in assuming that these cannot be re-soled?
Also, do you have any experience with Edward Green’s Portlands. Are these in any way comparable? These would appear to be £135 cheaper.
Many thanks.
Yes, they cannot be resoled.
I know the Portlands, though don’t own any. The calfskin they use might be more expensive than the lamb, but then they also don’t have elements like the finishing on the leather binding and the insole. So not much to justify higher price other than the costs of running a bigger company/factory
I thought this had to do with Peter Sagan and I got very excited. But he’s Slovak and not Belgian 😉
I feel a celebrity tie up coming on. If anyone could cycle in a soft-soled slipper, it’s him
I too thought Sagan was a strange name for a Belgian loafer, which I might associate more with Pippo Pozzato. I assume a Sagan would be that shoe that could do everything really well, but only rarely is the absolute best.
Or, better yet, a loafer that is getting better with age, and which is excellent for walking up cobbled hills.
Simon, thanks for this insightful article. I’ve never seen a pair of Belgian loafers that I thought made any sense, usually due to poor quality and too close a resemblance to house slippers. This shoe may be an exception, at least in your opinion. I notice that the vamp appears to be very low. Is that my imagination or is that just how Belgians are designed?
It tends to be quite low, yes
I was just told by B&L that they can make the vamp higher.
I don’t agree that they look too much like slippers, the light construction is ideal on a hot day. They seem like good value against the EG Portlands I have, and cover similar ground. Thanks for the post.
I like these. As you mention, Simon, some of us me included, wear driving shoes outside. These look like an interesting alternative at a similar price point to say Tods. The construction quality also looks far superior. I have registered my interest on their site
This seems to be a great choice for a casual-Friday shoe in the office during warmer days. Just an off topic question here – would you still recommend the La Portegna slippers for the time spent in Airports/ Planes? Or would you rather use these for this purpose (please ignore the price difference between these two). Thanks!
Good question. I still love the La Portegnas, but they are purely slippers. You can’t really walk around in the same way
Very stylish and agree a step up from Rubanacci’s offerings. Would be interested in your review of Allan’s other offerings, mto or bespoke.
Will do. No experience currently
Simon,
Quick random question for you regarding these types of unlined suede loafers: Would you recommend using shoe trees in them? I recently purchased a pair of unlined suede shoes and am not sure whether shoe trees would stretch and distort the suede over time.
Sincerely,
Rick
Shoe trees are a lot less required than with more structured formal shoes, as there is less shape to maintain and less leather to dry out. But I would still keep them in trees most of the time – they won’t stretch them unless the tree is too big
Hi Simon,
These are lovely shoes ineed! Obviously, the usual bows being dumped makes these loafers stand out. And apparently, Allan has done his best to make them harder wearing too.
I believe that the best color for suede loafers is dark brown, due to its versality and suitably for Summer.
John
Yes, dark brown is definitely the most useful.
Hi Simon,
Lovely shoes, probably the best option to wear around the city in the warmer months when espadrilles are too informal. Never liked driving shoes due to its shape.
Do you happen to know why they are called belgian loafer and what is their origin?
Best,
I guess a post exclusively devoted to loafers may be of interest to PS readers. I have in mind their varied levels of formality. I know there are French – mind you, they are not alone ! – who would wear a suit with a pair, say, of JM Weston loafers (the famous180), which in my opinion would look way better with denim. Other loafers – for instance, your recently featured G&G – could easily go along with a casual Summer suit, whereas others couldn’t, and thus would remain within the confines of denim and a like.
Yes, I think there are loafers and loafers. What would be your take on this topic?
Interesting points, and yes I think deserves a full post
Simon
Apologies for the schoolboy error on the sweater. I bought a sweater from A&S several weeks ago and was gently steered away from the cotton one I looked at on the grounds that cotton sweaters do not keep their shape too well.
Paul
They’re right, they won’t keep their shape as well as the shetlands at all. But as long as the fit is nice and close at the start, it should remain a nice fit
The loafers look superbly constructed, and go so well with your (extremely comfortable-looking and stylish) linen trousers. Thanks for this post!
Simon, would you recommend the black one for formal suiting (e.g. charcoal grey)? Thanks
It would be a style statement, given its still a very casual shoe, but I think it could look very cool yes
Hi Simon,
1. I have particularly narrow feet and wear a B width in Allen-Edmonds (I believe you’ve never tried American shoes, so I know you can’t really compare). Would loafers such as these reshape to my narrow feet, or will they be too large and it is best I steer clear?
2. I’m mostly in need of a shoe I can wear in warm weather outside, though still professional looking. Belgian and Italian loafers are what I’m considering. Given that these cannot be resoled, and given their delicacy overall, am I best to steer clear of these in favour of different options more suited to street use?
Thanks!
1. Best to ask Alan for advice on the narrowness, I don’t know whether that might be too slim
2. I would look at a normal loafer if you want something to use outside all the time
Dear Simon,
hoping this thread is still on – could you comment on the difference between these and La Portegna – the Mocassins, not the Slippers – in terms of money per quality?
Many thanks,
Michael
These are far better made. Hard to quantify exact price/quality ratio, but in any case these are much dressier and I would use them as such.
PS all threads are always live!
After initially thinking I wouldn’t get these, I ended up purchasing. They filled a real need – shoes that can be quickly slipped on and off as I go in and out of the house, yet still look good.
They are quote soft like a slipper, with the exception of the heel counter – which helps keep them on. The fit is more that of a slipper than a shoe. I would consider them too short for a shoe (my toes nearly touch the end). However the lambskin is so soft that this hasn’t been a problem – though I wouldn’t wear these all day.
Hello Simon. They look great but how true to size are they? I have been recommended to get them as tight as possible as they will stretch due to them being unlined. Thank you in advance.
I found the length true to size, it was the width that stretched (and therefore no need to worry about different widths)
Hi Simon,
I am going to spring for a pair of these but since I can only afford one pair, I want to be sure I choose the most versataile color. I am stuck between the dark brown Lusitania and the oak brown. I know earlier you said the dark brown is most versatile but is the oak brown dark too? Some photos it looks dark and others somewhat mid brown. Essentially, I would like to be able to wear these with navy and charcoal trousers without too much of a contrast . Your feedback is much appreciated.
Dark brown in that case, definitely
To wear with navy suits and navy jackets with grey trousers, which leather do you recommend for the dark browns: the suede, smooth nappa or grainy nappa?
In which style: tassel, string, penny or classic?
Thank you so much.
The suede primarily, despite being a bit more casual than leather. And the style is really up to you – I find the classic the most versatile, but the style isn’t affected that much by the rest of the outfit
Hey Simon, is the colour of the pair you’re wearing ‘Lusitanias dark brown’ or ‘dark brown’?
Dark brown
One problem with the Sagan’s is that the vamp is very short and this causes an issue if you have larger feet because when you put them on they look like a women’s shoe. Belgians have a pointier and slightly higher vamp which optically looks better on a larger foot.
Hi Simon,
I checked these out at the recent pop-up and was impressed. I am interested in now buying a pair for next Summer and was wondering whether you would recommend the dark brown or your own special Bark Grey colour? Bear in mind the only other loafers I have are a pair of C&J cavendish in cordovan and some unlined tan Alden pennys.
I anticipate wearing them with lightweight summer trousers and linen shorts while on holiday in Europe and perhaps in London on warmer days.
I’d recommend dark brown then to be honest
Hi Simon,
Thanks for all that you do! My wedding is in early June, and I am wearing a black double breasted tuxedo. I plan on wearing a Baudoin & Lange loafer, but the trouble is, I can’t decide which style would look best/be the most appropriate. I am debating between the Sagan in black suede with the string bow or black patent leather (no bow).
Also, what are your thoughts on wearing a black oxford rather than a loafer? I have very flat feet, and worry that my flat footedness will cause the loafers to loose their shape and end up looking sloppy.
Any thoughts/advice/insights are greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
I wouldn’t worry about the sloppiness, I haven’t found that happen. I’d go for one without a tassle though, just a black suede probably. Patent would be a little limited in use elsewhere
Hi Simon.
Do you wear the Sagans with shorts? I have seen pictures in the blog where you wear suede loafers but not the Sagan.
Thanks,
Good point. I tend not to in general – they are a little too slim and dressy perhaps
Hi Simon. Have been looking at the Sagans for a while now and am tempted considering the heat right now in the UK. But , they aren’t really my style, can you recommend an alternative, perhaps suede brogues or so. Thanks.
I think the alternatives are basically summer loafers, which most of the Northampton makers do – some unlined. I like the Edward Green ones but Crocketts and others do good ones I think. They’re all similar to each other and different to the cemented, light nature of the Sagans though
Simon,at the risk of losing style points I’ve seen suede moccasins in M&S and Jones The Bootmakers for around £70.I have to admit they look really nice…very similar to Gucci’s in brown,navy and grey.I must say that I’m very tempted to buy a few pairs.I think to myself what is the point of purchasing expensive Sagans that only have a short lifespan when for a fraction of the price I can purchase these inexpensive mocs wear them and then simply buy another pair when needed.Another case of style trumping make(costly make as well).
Hi Simon,
Do you use B&L’s shoe tree for your sagans? Or would it only be necessary for deerskin or the Grand model?
I don’t use trees for any Sagans, suede or deerskin, and found them fine to be honest
Hi Simon,
Great to hear your firsthand experience, thank you
Hi Simon
i would like to ask some questions that a little bit off the topic, what is the main different between penny loafer and Tassel Loafer in terms of atmosphere. which one is more versatile?
A penny loafer is less showy and will generally be more versatile. Tassel loafers are loved by some and loathed by others, and also a little more subject to the whims of fashion
Would you recommend the dark brown over the oak brown as a more versatile choice? I’d likely wear them with everything from smarter olive or navy cotton trousers to stone chinos.
Yes, I think they’re both versatile but the dark brown marginally more so
I see from their website that there is a new indoor version of the sagan called Edition.
I’m considering a sagan which will be worn mainly indoors and I cannot decide between the Classic Sagan or the Edition. I definitely don’t need the Grand Sagan.
Yes, I have that Lindsay. It’s very nice, but I would only get it if you only plan to wear it indoors, never out.
Hi Simon,
I was wondering whether you would share your thoughts after a few months of owning the Sagan Lune. I’m considering ordering a pair and your experience is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
I really like them – they’re my house shoe now, basically, and given lockdown, that basically means I wear them most of the day, every day.
My only tip would be that I swapped for a slightly bigger size. I’m between a 42 and a 43 usually with the Sagans, and a 43 was right in the Lune, not a 42.
I hope that helps
Dear Simon,
What do you think of recently-introduced off-spin designs of the Belgian’s, by Baudoin & Lange and others? I’m thinking particularly of some penny-loafer-style ones that I saw (B&L, Yanko, another Spanish brand I’m forgetting, Berwick also I think). Those seem to be a good combo of the Belgian’s style and comfort and something more wearable with tailoring and less ‘adventurous’. Do you agree? Or are you more for the ‘traditional’ Belgians?
Thanks,
Stefan
I like the traditional ones myself, partly because the penny ones look like they’re trying to be something they’re not. I prefer the penny style in the Grand model – more of a normal, Blake-stitched shoe. And even then only in suede.
Hi Simon, I am looking to getting my first pair of Sagans, however I have a dilemma considering which colour to get. I think an all black suede would be a little too serious for my style, so it is currently between a dark and medium brown suede, and also reading your articles, you constantly name the brown suede loafer to be one of the top 5 shoes to own. That means that it is between the Lusitanias Dark Brown vs the Parisian Brown suede. I see myself wearing this with much of my wardrobe, everything from olive chinos, brown pants and even some jeans. In your opinion, which would be the better pair to own? Cheers
I’d always go with the darker brown Vincent